Normally CIE
A-level Business candidates assume autocratic leadership style is not a good option for
a business as they themselves do not like commanding environment. They consider
autocratic leader is the boring one who does not consider opinions and creativity of staffs. Reflecting themselves and standing in their own
situation they find any autocratic dean or teacher demotivating. It is true
that autocratic leadership style de-motivates creative staffs and labour
turnover increases. They are right in their situation but situation varies in
business cases. Thus, CIE A-level Business candidates should consider autocratic
leadership might be the best in some scenarios. Autocratic leadership will be
best in any case where workers are unskilled, dependent, inexperienced and not creative but leader is experienced, skillful and well-known for previous
decision-making. In such case, people are not creative enough to be
demotivated. Furthermore, autocratic leadership is best in crisis handling
situation and war-time situation. It is more significant in handling sensitive
issues and in a case where quick decision makes the hit.
CIE A-level
Business candidates, on the other hand, assume democratic leadership style to
be the best one. They might reflect their own situation thinking ‘freedom and
value’ do count for the best. They think democratic leadership of a teacher or
department head, where issues are discussed and their own writing pattern and
creativity in answers are encouraged, as the most suitable one. They are
correct for their situation. Democratic leadership suits where creative people
works and are taking responsibilities independently. People are properly
communicated about issues, problems or progress in a business. Discussion
before making decision provides a platform for workers to forward their
creativity. Those creative people provide new ideas that might input in
business for its success. For Involvement in decision-making, people find their
values. All of these together boost up motivation in people. Further, people
will be motivated to give their best. They take the decision as their own as
the decision is taken after discussion with them. But as said above, situation
varies in business cases. Thus, democratic leadership style might not be best
all the time. Decision making might be delayed in democratic leadership style
as discussion takes time for conclusion. Such delayed decision might cause some
opportunities to be lost. Similarly, in case of crisis-handling and dealing
with sensitive issues, it’s better not to open issues and discuss among people
for decision. If people are dependent and not creative, democratic leadership style
will be useless. Sometimes conflict in discussion and wrong decision for going
with group might impact business negatively.
Note that:
laissez-faire leadership style is extreme democratic type. So it is to some
extent covered by democratic leadership explanation. To be more specific, in
democratic leadership some authority might also be delegated to people but in
laissez-faire approximately all the authority will be given to staffs along
with a control band to work with. For the freedom to do work, especially
research work can have best result. Thus, Laissez-faire is most suitable in
research work.
Note that: CIE A-level Business might ask for suitable leadership style or
appropriateness of a leadership style. The clue is none of the
leadership style is best. Appropriateness of a leadership style depends on
given scenario. Sometimes autocratic leadership style might be better;
sometimes democratic leadership might be the best. CIE A-level Business
candidates must be conscious to find the better leadership style with reference
to a case given to them.
If previous case
is referred (Leadership styles - Part I), Mrs. Paula’s autocratic leadership
style seems inappropriate in ‘Case I’ for Tim and some of his co-worker seems
experienced with abilities to bear responsibilities. Mr. Sam’s democratic
leadership style seems appropriate in ‘Case II’ for his staffs seems to be creative
and team-working. For ‘Case IV’, Laissez-Faire leadership might be okay with
Mr. William but referring to other three people, laissez faire might not be
suitable.
Note that: Autocratic and democratic leadership are best explained with Theory
X and Theory Y concepts of McGregor. Autocratic leader does not discuss with
workers. This might be because he thinks workers are not creative and
dependent. They are to make responsible providing proper command and
controlling each action with close supervision. Referring to McGregor, Theory X
manager thinks workers are not creative, not able to take responsibilities and
not liking jobs; therefore, autocratic leadership is considered best. Such
thinking might build Theory X culture where workers will really be dependent,
and not enthusiast for work until said to do.
The next clue
comes over here. Until such Theory X culture is changed, democratic leadership
is not possible. If Theory Y culture exists, workers will be independent,
motivated and creative. People can be discussed to reach better decision. Under
this culture, Theory Y manager is developed. Theory Y manager thinks that
workers are creative, able to take responsibilities and enjoying jobs.
If CIE A-level Business
candidates are suggesting democratic leadership to improve motivation of
experienced staff that is hindered by autocratic leader, they should reflect
need of changing from Theory X concept to Theory Y concept. They should not only outline Theory Y manager
should be appointed, but also refer need of Theory Y culture to be developed.
(Further post is coming soon.)
No comments:
Post a Comment