Leadership style
varies depending on how decisions are made on a business. A leader might be
making decision alone or in association with people. Some leadership styles
also provide authority to its people to make decision. Let’s take following
cases to clarify concepts of various leadership patterns.
Case I: Mrs.
Paula owns a shopping mart. She does not prefer to discuss or share anything
with her staffs with regard to problem or progress in the mart. The only thing
she thinks is she has to yell at the staffs to make them work better and
command her staffs each time what they got to do. Tim, the manager at the mart
is experienced for years and he is always annoyed for her shouting at him. He
and some of his co-workers are looking for job elsewhere.
Case II: Mr. Sam is the principal at a school.
Since his appointment as a principal, number of students attending the school
has been dramatically increased. He develops frequent seminars and meetings
with his staffs so that they can be well communicated on the school’s
situation. Before making any decision, he develops a discussion table with the
relevant staffs. There have been lots of changes in schools since he became the
principal. However, he gives credits to relevant staffs whose creativity came
forth for the change. Sam has explained the success of school is not only for
his effort but also for the efforts of all his team members.
Case III: Mr. Edward
owns a small petrol station. His two sons, one daughter along with 3 other
staffs work with him. However, the business is under his sole ownership. Last
year, he added a workshop for repairing automobiles. Before deciding to open
the workshop, he asked for opinion of his sons and daughter for expansion
option. His daughter suggested him to add a retail selling additional lubricants
required for vehicles. Both on his sons asked him to add on taxi service to
serve local people nearby. He listened to all but he made the decision by
himself and added the workshop hiring three mechanics as his additional staffs.
Case IV: Miss
April has expanded her business to various industries. She owns a retail shop,
a diamond shop, a real state and a travel agency. Recently, she took over a
bakery house. For the bakery house, she appointed Mr. William and other 3 other
people whom she has given whole responsibility to make it a success. All are
MBA graduate. Mr. William got specialization in hotel management while others
have specializations in other different fields. They have been given full authority
to make any decision on their own including hiring of any staffs required. But
she outlined the bakery should only be targeting to provide quality items to
4-star or above hotels. Mr. William is so much enthusiast to use his creativity
and his decision making power. However, other three are anxious for the extended
freedom. They think they neither will have any guidance nor will have any
feedback for his work from Miss April.
Now, let’s
analyse all the cases outlined above. ‘Case I’ is case of autocratic leadership
style. Paula seems to be authoritarian leader. She has been making decision
alone without anyone’s consent. ‘Case II’ refers to democratic leadership
style. Mr. Sam is making the decision in consultation with his people. In ‘case
III’, Edward listens to his people but makes decision on his own. So, it is the
case of paternalist leadership. ‘Case IV’ shows freedom in making decision given
a limit of dealing with 4-star or above hotels only. Here, even Miss April has
given authority to Mr. William and other three people in making decision within
the given limit. Thus there is ‘Laissez- Faire’ style of leadership.
The clue
comes over here. Specific leadership style might not be clearly said but implied. CIE A-level Business candidates are required to identify which specific
leadership style the case is dealing with.
Note that: Case III is just for simple understanding. CIE A-level Business
has not included paternalist leadership in the syllabus. However, CIE A-level
candidate can add on that concept in his writing.
CIE A-level
Business might also be asking advantages and disadvantages for a leadership
style adopted in the case. CIE A-level Business candidate should make sure not to
escape what is given in the case along with other possible answers. Such
references improve the score in CIE.
Referring to
above ‘case I’, with autocratic leadership of Mrs. Paula, Tim and some of his
co-workers are leaving the shopping mart. That outlines demotivated staffs as a
disadvantage of that leadership style. Similarly, in ‘case II’, with democratic
leadership style, Mr. Edward is able to use creativity of staffs for the
business success. Most probably, the staffs are motivated for proper
communication and consultation in making-decision. Referring to ‘case IV’, for
‘Laissez-fair’ style of leadership, people are motivated
to work for freedom to work. Mr. William seems highly motivated to use his
creativity and most probably reach self-actualisation. That can be added as
advantages for the leadership style. On the other hand, the disadvantages can
be outlined with reference to other three people who are anxious for lack of
confidence for their doing due to no guidance and feedback provided.
(‘Leadership Styles - Part
II’ will be posted soon.)
No comments:
Post a Comment